The Indian textile industry plays a vital role in the supply chain and marketing of garments and diverse handloom products, thereby strengthening India's commercial position in the global market. The exceptional performance of textiles in the regions of Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Punjab in terms of woollen production facilities. According to the Annual Survey of Industries (ASI), 23.6% of the textile sector in Gujarat exhibits high levels of production.

Textile industries generate a large volume of complex effluents during the processing of clothes, and before discharging, which is a high organic and inorganic effluent load on the environment. Azo, Benzo, Cationic, Xanthene, a group of dyes that are effective in our humanity and the abiotic life cycle. According to the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) survey, 92 million tons of effluent were generated in FY23-24. This wastewater often shows high TDS, salinity, alkalinity, and electrical conductivity, primarily originating from salt-intensive dyeing processes. Additionally, textile wastewater contains heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Ni, Zn), formaldehyde-based resins, and chlorinated compounds, posing ecotoxicological and human health risks. Some of the most carcinogenic groups of dyes are the reactive dyes, which are harmful and highly soluble in water molecules, for example, RB21 (Reactive Turquoise Blue 21) dye. The general molecule's formula is C₄₀H₂₅CuN₉O₁₄S₅, represents a copper phthalocyanine reactive dye with multiple functional groups (nitrogen heterocycles, sulfonic groups) around a central Cu atom. Typically contains reactive vinyl sulfonyl (–SO₂–CH=CH₂) or sulfatoethylsulphonyl groups that can form covalent bonds with hydroxyl (–OH) groups of cellulose fibres during the dying process. One of the most advanced research studies was successfully published in a reputed journal, which one is the advance solutions to degrade this carcinogenic pollutant by using the AOPs (Advance Oxidation Processes) technique.
Catalyst is the altering the rate of the reaction. One of the most susceptible, highly active, emerging, and advanced materials in the presence of visible light also enhances COD, BOD, and DO rates to make water drinkable. Recent breakthroughs to mineralise faster RB21 with the combination of materials with hybrid techniques like Photocatalyst+Ultrasonication, UV+Ozonation, Corona Discharge Plasma with Fe2+ addition,n etc.
|
Method
|
Approx. RB21 Removal
|
Notes
|
|
Corona plasma + Fe²⁺
|
~100% color removed, ~83 % COD ↓
|
Advanced oxidation
|
|
Photo‑ozonation
|
~99 %
|
Very short reaction times
|
|
SmFeO₃‑rGO + ultrasound
|
High degradation (faster)
|
Effective on the actual effluent
|
|
Fly ash adsorption
|
Moderate capacity
(~105 mg g⁻¹)
|
Very low cost
|
|
Photocatalysis with MgFe2O4
|
93 % removal rate
|
AOP, low cost
|
Figure 1: Advance Oxidation Process (AOPs) Techniques performance over RB21 dye degradation (Predictive analysis) (a) Various AOPs Utilised for RB21 dye (b) Concentration variation over RB21 with Vis. + H2O2
Figure 1 assumes a RB21 dye concentration of 25 ppm, utilising AOPs techniques, including ozonation, photocatalysis, photo-Fenton, and UV and Vis light irradiation with H₂O₂ as an oxidant to break the interaction between the dye and H₂O molecules.
Azo bond is extremely ozone-sensitive -N=N- bond undergoes rapid cleavage, R-N=N-R + Ozone to form aromatic amines with smaller fragments. When using ozonation, one ozone molecule can break chromophoric structure, leading to rapid decolourisation, but at high concentrations of RB21,
Ozone + OH− → •OH + O2
•OH+RB21→fragmented intermediates
Why its happening, ozonation destroys chromophores first, and some aromatic fragments remain due to not destroyed completely, like sulfonated benzene/naphthalene derivatives. It becomes colourless but lack of degradation onto benzene rings. Why aromatic fragments are hard to remove becausethey have resonance stability and can react with ozone slowly in the presence of hydroxyl radicals.
Figure (a) compares the degradation performance of Reactive Blue 21 (RB21) dye utilizing various advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) across reaction time. All processes demonstrate a time-dependent rise in degradation efficiency, indicating continual reactive oxygen species formation. Initial degradation is modest due to negligible radical formation. UV/H₂O₂ and visible light/H₂O₂ systems outperform ozonation, photocatalysis, and photo-Fenton reactions in degradation efficiency as irradiation time increases. Superior performance of peroxide-assisted systems is due to increased photolysis of H₂O₂, resulting in numerous hydroxyl radicals (•OH) with strong non-selective oxidation capability. The photo-Fenton process degrades effectively by Fe²⁺/Fe³⁺ redox cycling under light, while photocatalysis and ozonation have reduced efficiency due to electron-hole recombination and restricted oxidant use. The study shows that light-assisted H₂O₂-based AOPs effectively degrade RB21.
Figure (b) shows how initial RB21 concentration impacts degradation efficiency during visible light/H₂O₂ treatment at various irradiation periods. Increased dye concentration decreases degradation efficiency, suggesting faster degradation kinetics at lower initial concentrations. Low dye concentrations (10–25 ppm) increase efficiency due to better light penetration and more hydroxyl radicals per dye molecule. In contrast, greater concentrations (75–100 ppm) impair efficiency due to the inner filter effect, increased solution opacity, and extra dye molecules and intermediate degradation products competing for hydroxyl radicals. However, continuous irradiation boosts deterioration at all concentrations, proving the durability of the visible light/H₂O₂ combination. These findings show that initial dye concentration controls reaction kinetics and AOP efficiency.
In the figure, sets for the degradation of the pollutants with various techniques for the effluent treatment. The first graph shows the results based on the different concentration 10, 20, and 30 ppm over the US (Ultrasound) in the presence of UV light, with PDS and a certain amount of catalyst dosage were estimated. That graph shows that the highest degradation range is at 10 ppm, while 30 ppm shows the results are much lower due to the increase in the concentration of effluent.